Monday, 11 May 2020

Our Hall(rr)owed Spaces




A few years ago I had an opportunity to visit, along with my wife, the holy temple of Viswanatha in Varanasi. Every Hindu looks forward to visit Kasi once in his/her lifetime. There is a general belief in Hindu ethos about Kasi: “Even if you cannot die in Kasi – a fortune not easily won by one and all – at least visit it once while you are still alive.” So there was a lot of expectation.

But what we saw there was a contradiction, a mockery of that expectation. We went slightly late in the night when the crowds have dispersed and they were about to close the temple. The queue lines were nearly empty of people but there were other things that slowed our progression. Clay tumblers in which Kasi-ites like to drink their milk were strewn around in gay abandon. We had to walk slowly, calibrating our footfalls, just to avoid the shards from penetrating our souls….err… soles. Cows were roaming the queue lines too, depositing everywhere the famously sacred dung and urine. There were also open toilets as you walk along the queue lines, giving the pilgrims a way to unburden, not just their world-weary hearts, but their kidneys too, all under the public eye. When we entered the main temple building, the sanctum sanctotum, we could see entire walls that had collapsed, with no signs of any effort towards restoration. The Darshan itself was quite quick and undramatic, thankfully, since we were too eager to get out. We came out with a feeling, quite contrary to what you would expect to feel after a visit to one of the greatest and the most ancient Hindu temples.
Pilgrims at Varanasi

Coincidentally, only a few days ago I happened to get a copy of the book “Wasted: The messy story of Sanitation in India, a Manifesto for Change” by Ankur Bisen. In  this most remarkable book, in the very first chapter titled “We the people,” the  author describes Mahatma Gandhi’s visit to the temple of Viswanatha in 1903. Gandhi did not like what he saw in the temple. “The swarming flies and the noise made by the shopkeepers and pilgrims were perfectly insufferable… Here one expected an atmosphere of meditation and communion, it was conspicuous by its absence.” Gandhi visited the temple again thirteen years later to attend the stone-laying ceremony of Banaras Hindu Temple. This time he wrote: “If a stranger dropped from above on to this great temple and he had to consider what we as Hindus were, would he not be justified in condemning us? Is not this great temple a reflection of our own character?”

Not much seemed to have changed from 1903 to the second decade of the third millennium. Why?

(Just about 10 km from Kasi, however, in the Buddhist temple of Sarnath, a very different spectacle greeted us. The place was far cleaner and quieter. People were speaking in hushed tones. The only notable sounds were those of the quaint spinning bells that you see in Buddhist temples. There were pilgrims from Sri Lanka and Japan saying their prayers in low tones.)

It is not just the main temple, the city of Varanasi is itself a specimen for demonstrating the kind of decadence that one witnesses in most Indian towns, particularly so in the northern part of India. As we were driving through the city, at places I could see large dilapidated buildings filled with garbage up to the second floor. There were canals filled with dark, inky flowing material, a stream that can only be compared to the river Styx that adorns Hell in Greek mythology.


We also visited one of the fabled ghats of Ganga. The river was at that time in spate. The waters were dark brown in color and not exactly inviting. We could see pilgrims waddling and struggling to swim in that waist deep dirty water. One the way back, we began to pour out our despair to the cab driver, lecturing about the virtues of hygiene. He heard us for a few minutes and retorted angrily in Hindi: “Please don’t talk like that. Ganga mayya is always pure!”


Where are the roots of India’s social backwardness? As an educated Indian one asks oneself this question quite often. The answer I tell myself, which is repeatedly confirmed by experiences like the above, is as follows. “We have adopted a world-view that is inspired by our religion, perpetuated by tradition, a world view in which what is actually horrifying and unacceptable, seems to be a picture of perfect harmony.” We have fixed ourselves for all eternity in a perspective for which the problem is simply non-existent. Our problem is that there is no problem!

My visit to another temple, this time in the north-eastern city of Guwahati is slightly different but essentially the same. The Kamakhya temple is one of the Shakti Pithas, temples dedicated to the Goddess in her various forms. I wanted to take the pedestrian route, hoping to enjoy the natural beauty of the hillside, and climbed the mountain path. The steps were broken at most places and pilgrim is greeted often by the stench of human feces.  The temple premises are occupied not just by pilgrims looking for salvation. It was  goats this time around – not cows. You could see them roaming the marble floors depositing their solid waste, as a solid demonstration of our spiritual egalitatianism that treats all creatures equally.

(Priest getting ready for goat sacrifice at Kamakhya Temple)

There is an interesting theory that all the stench and struggle, the pushing and the shoving that one often experiences in Hindu temples is there by design. The negative has to be there so that you can truly appreciate the positive. Without the ugly façade you cannot truly appreciate the enshrined Divine who is, by His very nature, the All-beautiful. But when we visited temples or hallowed spaces of other cultures we realized that such a theory is merely a perversion created by our unwillingness to change.

A case in point is our visit to the delightful little Kinkakuji temple of Japan. Kinkakuji is a Zen temple on the outskirts of Kyoto, a cultural center of Japan. The temple is called the Temple of the Golden Pavilion  because the main temple, rather small in size, has a golden plating. It is perhaps much smaller than the Golden temple of Amritsar, or the one in Tirumala. But what is most remarkable is the pristine pure manner in which its surroundings are kept. The only sounds you hear on the temple premises – in addition to the incessant chirping that fills the wooded surroundings – is the constant scraping sounds of rakes with which the monks, clad in spotless white robes, clear dry leaves off the pebbled paths. Actually it appeared that there is no need to clear the leaves all the time. Perhaps twice a day should do. Perhaps once a week. But for the monks the act of cleaning seems to be a kind of prayer that one does with one’s body, it is a way to do their devotions.

                                                                Kinkakuji temple 

Even minor temples in Kyoto, small street side temples, temples made of wood without the luxury of gold and silver, uniformly present one characteristic: unostentatious yet perfectly clean and tranquil surroundings.

Why is it such a hard ideal to achieve back home, everywhere, all the time?









No comments:

Post a Comment